FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
More intriguing is the rise of the . For decades, Tokyo was seen as a group-oriented society. Today, the most cutting-edge entertainment caters to the individual. Omakase sushi bars have always honored the solo diner, but now we have entire amusement parks (like the redesigned Tokyo Dome City) built for single riders. The phenomenon of Hitori Yakiniku (grilling your own meat alone in a private booth) is a billion-dollar industry. This isn't loneliness; it is curated solitude—a luxury in a crowd of 32 million.
Tokyo's nightlife boasts an extensive network of specialized listening bars. These intimate venues prioritize premium acoustics, vacuum-tube amplifiers, and vast vinyl collections, catering to audiophiles who seek a sophisticated, lower-tempo alternative to traditional nightclubs.
This identifier refers to Tokyo Hot n0322 , a specific entry in the long-running Japanese "Tokyo Hot" adult video series.
Showcases the latest in bags, leather goods, and personal styling.
The entry Tokyo Hot n0322 sits firmly within this 2008-era aesthetic. According to official archives, the work was a collaboration between the studio and the actress performing under the alias (一之瀬美久).
. This category covers everything from the production of swimming pool chemicals and matches to writing inks and essential oils.
has solidified its status as the city's "relaxed cool" hub, trending in 2026 for its massive concentration of vintage clothing shops, vinyl record stores, and small live houses like Basement Bar , which is currently celebrating its 31st anniversary. :
In essence, the search term is a specific query for a file or a product related to a particular Tokyo Hot video, with 325998 acting as an additional identifier from the source where the file was originally located.
Due to the nature of this content, I can provide a general overview of the production style and themes associated with this specific release to help you understand what to expect. Production Overview Series Style
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.