“The stopwatch,” he said, “is not a timepiece in operation. It is a souvenir of time stopped. The law chases noise and disruption, not silence and rust.”
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
The fundamental rule from which all interpretation begins is the literal rule. Justice G.P. Singh posits that if the words of a statute are clear, plain, and unambiguous, the courts are bound to give effect to that meaning, regardless of the consequences.
Courts may modify the grammatical and ordinary sense of words to avoid absurdity, but only to the extent necessary to remedy the absurdity. principles of statutory interpretation gp singh
The principles ensure a balance between adherence to the literal text and the need for a just, purposeful application of the law.
Identify the law before the act, the mischief the law did not provide for, and the remedy provided by Parliament.
Singh’s work is built on a deep, almost poetic conviction: His "story" of interpretation follows a specific progression: “The stopwatch,” he said, “is not a timepiece
Courts cannot add, subtract, or modify words in an unambiguous text.
For a deeper dive into the specific intricacies of the book, you can explore the commentary on the LexisNexis Store .
Provide a deeper dive into . Contrast his views on literal vs. purposive approaches . Share public link This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted
G.P. Singh - Principles of Statutory Interpretation | PDF - Scribd
Arvind Mehta, a watchmaker, had been found with this stopwatch in his coat pocket, three hundred meters from a polling booth. He wasn't timing anything. The stopwatch was broken. It had been broken for a decade.
AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional. Learn more